![]() ![]() The MM-100 is around twice as precise as the Sennheiser in instrument placement and separation. I just bought an HD-660 S2 which I enjoy, but found that things get slightly blurred together. Instrument separation is amazingly good for the price point. The balanced response with extremely clear mids is almost a carbon copy of its bigger brother. I can say they have hit their targets on all three counts. ![]() For a $300 “do everything” Bluetooth headphone I think the sound quality is much cleaner and more balanced than Bose / Sony / Beats and it will be my default recommendation for normal people who want normal headphones.Īudeze MM-100: The MM-500 is one of my favorite headphones, so I was eager to see whether Audeze could capture the high level of detail, laser-focused imaging, and balanced frequency response at a much lower price point. On the flip side, soundstage was fairly poor and notes did not have a great sense of weight nor impact. I was surprised that there was very little of the reverb/echo effect that characterizes closed backs. Vocals were very clear and bass was high enough to be enjoyable with pop songs, but didn’t bleed into the mids. Notes were well-separated and the headphone presented detail without putting a microscope to the music. The Maxwell presented them all in a very favorable light, with a forward and clean sound. I knew that it’s more of a mass-market headphone than an audiophile headphone, so I played a lot of my favorite indie pop tracks that have less than perfect recording quality. Limiting my impressions to new release headphones:Īudeze Maxwell: Expectations were high for this one, and it did not disappoint. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |